Am 18.09.2019 um 09:37 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > > sent from a phone > >> On 18. Sep 2019, at 09:22, Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch> wrote: >> >> My point was more that you should ignore the shop classification and >> assume that that this is simply facility that in some form provides >> access to clothes washing machines and space, because even a completely >> normal laundromat facility is not a shop. In hindsight it should have >> always been amenity=laundry (or similar) but that is a done deal. > > IMHO we shouldn’t ignore classifications. It would be easier to follow your > argument if the tag was indeed amenity=laundry but as it isn’t, the tag > should be used for what in OpenStreetMap is a shop (a business selling goods > or services)
Then nearly all amenities and leisure objects would be shops, consider for example amentity=toilets Which, as you likely know :-), exist both in free and paid versions. Providing access to a facility for use, regardless if free or not, is not a shop, not even in OSM. Simon > Cheers Martin > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
