Am Mi., 18. Sept. 2019 um 10:58 Uhr schrieb Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch>:
> Then nearly all amenities and leisure objects would be shops, consider > for example amentity=toilets Which, as you likely know :-), exist both > in free and paid versions. Providing access to a facility for use, > regardless if free or not, is not a shop, not even in OSM. laundries may offer additional services, e.g. they will sell washing powder, might sell sweets and drinks, offer internet access, etc. Some might also offer ironing and folding the laundry. I agree that there are cases where shop and amenity would both be suitable, and automated laundries might fall into this category. There are also places that are dedicated for doing your laundry but are not a "shop" because the use is free (and you will handwash your laundry), and for these "shop=laundry" would not fit, while amenity=laundry would. We should not exclude the possibility that we put similar features (features which serve the same purpose) into different categories depending whether they require a payment or are for free, if this seems natural for mappers. I would also hesitate to tag a place with a single washing machine, or maybe 2, as a "laundry", because of the limited capacity, so I believe having a washing machine tag for camp sites makes sense. Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
