Thanks Tobias The full tagging here would be: > > oneway = yes > oneway:bicycle = no <- oneway not for bicyclists > sidewalk = both <- there is a sidewalk on both sides > cycleway = track ...which is also a cycleway and > cycleway:segregated = no ...not segregated > > Because the unsegregated foot+cycleway is really slim, it'd be useful to > also record the width of the sidewalk/cycleway in > > cycleway:width = X >
Close, but "cycleway=track" is not correct, as the foot-cycle-"way" in question is a lane, similar to "cycleway=lane", but the resulting tagging does no imply that pedestrians an cyclists have to share these lanes. What In addition I need to express that the lanes are oneway for bicycles in opposite directions. In addition, but that is an Italian speciality, the shared foot-cycleway is legally a foot-way on which bicycles can circulate, but pedestrians have precedence. Maybe: highway=residential footway:left=lane footway:left:bicycle=designated footway:left:segregated=no footway:left:oneway:bicycle=yes footway:left:width=1.5 footway:right=lane footway:right:bicycle=designated footway:right:segregated=no footway:right:oneway:bicycle=-1 footway:right:width=1.5 But this will certainly not be digested by any router or renderer <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Virus-free. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
