On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 4:31 PM Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 at 22:10, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote: > >> >> Meanwhile the osmcha example appears to be a 5 way roundabout-type >> junction, but I don't have the clarity in that aerial view to tell if it's >> traversable or not. >> > > I went to the osmcha example and opened it in iD with Bing imagery. It > looks too large > for a mini roundabout. Three of the four roads have split lanes, which > makes it > incompatible with a mini roundabout. And there are some Mapillary photo > overlays which > show the central island to be raised with a wall (tall kerb?) around the > edge and some > large bushes in the centre. > OK, I'm looking at it in these images now: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=wnh2yPXi1HakCH5-dILZHw&lat=51.81508205831051&lng=8.849023785442114&z=17 https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=QPacIZqNSt0x4CasddMBKg&lat=51.81481744674556&lng=8.849143013905326&z=17 >From the ground, this is pretty unambiguously a mini roundabout to my eyes, albeit a somewhat large one. Just eyeballing it about the same size as the ones they recently installed in the next town over from me: https://www.newson6.com/story/40932988/walkability-project-starts-in-okmulgee (relevant screen grab if that link doesn't work for you: https://i.imgur.com/6aL1aZV.png, the plan shown says "Ø 16.00'", meaning "diameter 16 feet" (~4.88m). The important part is that the median is not physical.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
