On 1/14/2020 9:13 AM, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
Here's how the mappers have seen the tags in question so far,
according to Taginfo:

oneway:foot=no 1267 occurrences (not all from one region)
oneway:foot=yes 89
oneway:foot=-1, 1 occurrence

foot:oneway=no 48
foot:oneway=yes 2

foot:backward=designated 45
foot:backward=yes 41
foot:backward=no 40
foot:backward=use_sidepath (not really applicable here) 18
foot:backward=permissive 6
foot:backward=private 1

foot:forward=no 41
foot:forward=designated (not really applicable?) 36
foot:forward=use_sidepath (not really applicable) 23
foot:forward=yes 20
foot:forward=customers 4 (only customers and only one-way?)
foot:forward=destination 3 (might be Hotel California)
foot:forward=permissive 2

--Jarek

Thanks, and I'd like to add to this list:

highway=footway + oneway=* 26505
highway=footway + oneway:bicycle=* 2611
highway=footway + piste:oneway=* 1137

(Oh dear, looks like the ski mappers have chosen a different namespace
style than the bicycle mappers...)

J



_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to