Exactly my point. That's why I say the wiki is too ambiguous and restrictive.
A practical example (more simple, but still historic and cultural one): https://www.diariocoimbra.pt/files/news/5d8411800e7e4.png If I map this with amenity=drinking_water any Portuguese who uses OSM for searching waypoints is going to search for "fountain", not "drinking_water". But if I'm a newbie, I go to the amenity=fountain's wiki and I read "The water of those fountains is often not suitable for drinking" and I only see examples of decorative fountains there. That's the main issue I'm struggling with. But I agree with the amenity=fountain + drinking_water=yes for these cases, adding the historic and heritage tags wherever possible. Às 07:25 de 03/02/2020, Martin Koppenhoefer escreveu:
Am Mo., 3. Feb. 2020 um 09:59 Uhr schrieb Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com <mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com>>: The request is for a fountain of utilitarian purpose, not historic, artistic or cultural. How could we deny there is cultural or historic background for this fountain? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Loriga_-_Fontan%C3%A1rio.JPG A purely utilitarian purpose water source in the city would look like this: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Water_tap_brass.JPG Cheers Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
