I am starting to tag parking:lane:*=* on a cycle route in London for
which I have just uploaded Mapillary images. The potential risk of
"dooring" and the hope that routing engines may in future be able to
make use of this information.

-- 
Robert Skedgell (rskedgell)

On 10/02/2020 20:56, Volker Schmidt wrote:
> This is a pity as the no-parking and in particular the no-stopping
> information is important to understand the traffic flow in a street.
> I have come across this problem as I am working on instructions how to
> tag streets form a cyclist point of view. One of the things is to
> understand if there are cars parked/stopped or not on the road. If there
> are there is always the risk of "dooring" and hence the street is less
> suitable for cyclists.
> 
> On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 at 21:51, Martin Koppenhoefer
> <dieterdre...@gmail.com <mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>     sent from a phone
> 
>     > Il giorno 10 feb 2020, alle ore 20:43, Mateusz Konieczny via
>     Tagging <tagging@openstreetmap.org
>     <mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org>> ha scritto:
>     >
>     > Note also that "stopping=yes|no" is unclear and
>     "parking:lane:both=no_stopping" is
>     > clear.
> 
> 
>     yes, clear madness ;-)
>      Why would we describe a place beneath or on the road where you
>     cannot even stop as “parking lane”?
> 
>     Cheers Martin
> 
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     Tagging mailing list
>     Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org>
>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> 


_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to