In general, are these signs physically on the camera, or are they in the vicinity? If so, should they be tagged objects in their own account?
On Wed, 19 Feb 2020, 10:54 John Sturdy, <jcg.stu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Whatever the concensus in another discussion was, I think that double > negatives will risk confusion, and that *:signed=yes and *:signed=no seems > to be a reasonable proposal. > > I have noticed that some but not all of the surveillance cameras (city > council, I believe) in Cambridge (UK) have signs. > > __John > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:13 AM marc marc <marc_marc_...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > >> Le 19.02.20 à 04:29, Victor/tuxayo a écrit : >> > Coincidentally there was a recent discussion[2] about these signs in the >> > french mailing list (talk-fr) which lead to adding the following section >> > in the page >> > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made=surveillance >> >> I warn that this addition does not reflect the discussion that took >> place on talk-fr, but is "self-declared as consensus" >> more than half of the opinions are that a regulatory sign of this kind >> is not tourist information (imho I think it is closer to a sign that >> announces a pedestrian crossing or a maxspeed zone) >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
