I think a warning sign is legally required in Nederland. I don't think it's very useful to register the absence or presence of mandatory warning signs in OSM. If it is not there, report it to whoever is supposed to maintain or enforce it. If you want to register incidents to make a stand, an ushahidi-type of register is better I think.
For the cams themselves I see a use case, but the presence or absence of a sign does not seem relevant to me. The overall camera situation is very dynamic, so I do see a problem with coverage, quality, maintenance and actuality. Best, Peter Elderson Op wo 19 feb. 2020 om 12:54 schreef John Sturdy <jcg.stu...@gmail.com>: > On the ones I've noticed in Cambridge, they are either on the lower part > of the pole supporting the camera, or, for building-mounted cameras, on the > wall below the camera. (The cameras are well above head height, and > notices on them would not be readable unless very large.) > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 11:48 AM Jez Nicholson <jez.nichol...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> In general, are these signs physically on the camera, or are they in the >> vicinity? If so, should they be tagged objects in their own account? >> >> On Wed, 19 Feb 2020, 10:54 John Sturdy, <jcg.stu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Whatever the concensus in another discussion was, I think that double >>> negatives will risk confusion, and that *:signed=yes and *:signed=no seems >>> to be a reasonable proposal. >>> >>> I have noticed that some but not all of the surveillance cameras (city >>> council, I believe) in Cambridge (UK) have signs. >>> >>> __John >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:13 AM marc marc <marc_marc_...@hotmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Le 19.02.20 à 04:29, Victor/tuxayo a écrit : >>>> > Coincidentally there was a recent discussion[2] about these signs in >>>> the >>>> > french mailing list (talk-fr) which lead to adding the following >>>> section >>>> > in the page >>>> > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made=surveillance >>>> >>>> I warn that this addition does not reflect the discussion that took >>>> place on talk-fr, but is "self-declared as consensus" >>>> more than half of the opinions are that a regulatory sign of this kind >>>> is not tourist information (imho I think it is closer to a sign that >>>> announces a pedestrian crossing or a maxspeed zone) >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Tagging mailing list >>>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Tagging mailing list >>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
