We had a pretty lengthy discussion last October subject:'Cycling
relation misuse' . I got the impression that a route should be more
than just a short trail.
Are you saying that every trail should be route?
Example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6632400
My subject line should have been route relations.
On 5/11/20 10:23 PM, Kevin Kenny wrote:
Waymarked Trails associates waymarks only with routes, and assumes
that any waymarked route, from local to international, will have a
route relation describing it.
Is there a reason that you see route relations for shorter routes as
being 'wrong'?
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:17 PM brad <bradha...@fastmail.com> wrote:
I see a lot of relations, type:route, which are only short
trails/paths. This is wrong isn't it? Do you suppose that folks are
doing this to get better rendering?
Brad
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
