On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 10:43 AM Jmapb <jm...@gmx.com> wrote: > On 5/13/2020 10:12 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > > > We've had relations for over a decade now, IIRC. It's time to stop > treating this basic primitive as entity-non-grata. If tools *still* can't > deal with this, this is on the tools and their developers now. > > Sure. Regarding the original question -- in what circumstances are > single-member walking/hiking/biking route relations a good mapping practice > -- what would be your answer? >
Is it part of a network? Is it signed as part of a network? OK 166 was a single member relation until I did lane tagging on it and had to split that way a couple times.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
