Sounds like rendering for the mapper...don't know if that's as bad as the other way around....
Op vr 22 mei 2020 om 16:07 schreef Andrew Harvey <andrew.harv...@gmail.com>: > > > On Fri, 22 May 2020 at 22:33, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging < > tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > >> >> >> >> May 22, 2020, 13:55 by andrew.harv...@gmail.com: >> >> >> >> On Fri, 22 May 2020 at 21:44, Daniel Westergren <wes...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Yeah, I guess there's no way to force the user to add a surface tag when >> adding a highway=path. We could also use analyzing tools to look for recent >> edits with only highway=path and comment to users about the use of surface >> etc. >> >> >> I think that's a step too far, while it's nice for people to add extra >> attributes and we should try to make it easier for mappers to discover what >> tags there are and use them, there is no obligation to, the same way a >> building=yes on a node is much appreciated even if it's not traced out in a >> way and has the building type mapped, a lone highway=path is still useful >> alone. >> >> Improving editors would be a better step, such extreme nagging is more >> likely to discourage people. >> > > Agreed, though I think the biggest driver for the casual mapper would be > to close the feedback loop so they can actually see this change. ie. making > the default OSM style render width and surface. > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
