https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/blob/master/CARTOGRAPHY.md#general-purpose
It is one of goals of this map style. May 22, 2020, 16:17 by pelder...@gmail.com: > Sounds like rendering for the mapper...don't know if that's as bad as the > other way around.... > > Op vr 22 mei 2020 om 16:07 schreef Andrew Harvey <> andrew.harv...@gmail.com> > >: > >> >> >> On Fri, 22 May 2020 at 22:33, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <>> >> tagging@openstreetmap.org>> > wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> May 22, 2020, 13:55 by >>> andrew.harv...@gmail.com>>> : >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, 22 May 2020 at 21:44, Daniel Westergren <>>>> wes...@gmail.com>>>> >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> Yeah, I guess there's no way to force the user to add a surface tag when >>>>> adding a highway=path. We could also use analyzing tools to look for >>>>> recent edits with only highway=path and comment to users about the use of >>>>> surface etc. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I think that's a step too far, while it's nice for people to add extra >>>> attributes and we should try to make it easier for mappers to discover >>>> what tags there are and use them, there is no obligation to, the same way >>>> a building=yes on a node is much appreciated even if it's not traced out >>>> in a way and has the building type mapped, a lone highway=path is still >>>> useful alone. >>>> >>> Improving editors would be a better step, such extreme nagging is more >>> likely to discourage people. >>> >> >> Agreed, though I think the biggest driver for the casual mapper would be to >> close the feedback loop so they can actually see this change. ie. making the >> default OSM style render width and surface. >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
