The aurelian walls left today are not one continuous element, so the site relation is practical as it allows to group all the linear or area features that are forming the old city walls. I used many time in cities when few ruins of the same original object exist at different places (often walls), so you can clearly link them together with this relation. ^_^
Best Regards, Lionel Le lun. 13 juil. 2020 à 09:00, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > sent from a phone > > > On 13. Jul 2020, at 05:59, Yves <y...@mailbox.org> wrote: > > > > Why do you say "A site means things are concentrated around a point", > sites relation helps to map disjoint elements, but I don't think I saw > anything about their repartition. > > > it is my interpretation of the term “site” and a kind of proposal to > modify the site relation description in the wiki > > > > Also it certainly makes no sense to have sites extending over extremely > large areas. > > > at least not if they aren’t “compact” > > Cheers Martin > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
