On 7/31/20 14:29, Paul Johnson wrote: > Name is only the name. Names are not refs. For the above example, > ref=NY 214, noname=yes would be the right way.
How about the stretch of FM 1960 from I-45 or so going east into Humble? Addresses on it are "xxxx FM 1960 East", though I think it used to be signed as "Humble-Huffman Road" even though nobody puts that in the addresses anymore. I currently have name=FM 1960 East alongside ref=FM 1960 (and maybe an alt_name=* too). (For those outside of Texas, FM or RM is like a lower class of state highway called Farm-/Ranch-To-Market Roads.) I'm on the side that name=* should match what's in addr:street=*, even if there's some duplicity, but maybe there should be some other tag to say perhaps the name shouldn't be rendered on (most) visual maps and/or read out separately from the ref in navigation software. -- Shawn K. Quinn <skqu...@rushpost.com> http://www.rantroulette.com http://www.skqrecordquest.com _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
