I fixed the wiki of the proposal, any new comments before I start the voting again?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Admission Janko čet, 26. stu 2020. u 16:43 Janko Mihelić <jan...@gmail.com> napisao je: > Results: 1 approved, 6 opposed, 3 abstained. > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Admission > > No one was opposed to the core idea of the Admission proposal, just > technicalities. So we should go over them and later try again: > > 1. access=admisson > This was the biggest problem, five voters opposed because of it. People > were asking why not the more established access=customers or access=permit. > I thought about access=admission to be an entrance into the admission > scheme, after which the router searches for the relation. But maybe that > isn't needed, so mappers can put access=customer, access=permit, or > access=admission if it passes in a separate proposal. Wiki user Lectrician1 > proposed access=customer + customer=admission which sounds ok for when > admission is not free. > > 2. the word "issue" for role > Three voters thought this word is strange for a place that gives you > tickets or other admission tokens. They thought "issuing_place", > "issuing_authority", "issuer", "ticket" or "voucher" would be better. I > still think "issue" is the easiest to remember, and to combine in different > tags like issue:website=*. > > Thanks for your comments, > Janko >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging