On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 12:54 PM Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging < [email protected]> wrote:
> I am not exactly happy about "rock slide" as it seems weird to use it where > danger is primarily about individual rocks dropping, not about full scale > rock slide. > > Personally I would prefer "failing rocks" for warning used by a standard > road > sign. > > (difference is minor, but if we have luxury of selecting any value...) > Since we do have that luxury, and there is a valid reason for preferring terminology as actually signed, then we can adopt "hazard=falling_rocks" (53 usages) and deprecate "hazard=rockfall" (182 usages). These are small enough numbers that there shouldn't be any harm in choosing the smaller one. Can we treat landslide and rock_slide as the same thing? If so, "hazard=rock_slide" has 394 usages and "hazard=landslide" has 35 usages. In that case, I would propose to adopt the more popular "rock_slide" and deprecate "landslide" as duplicate. Would this address the concerns?
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
