Vào lúc 14:08 2020-12-08, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging đã viết:
Mapper in Poland run into a tricky case and asked for help.
I am forwarding this a bit weird case.
Photo is at
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Krak%C3%B3w_Brodzi%C5%84skiego_(5).jpg
<https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Krak%C3%B3w_Brodzi%C5%84skiego_(5).jpg>
and depicts
- contraflow bicycle lane
- bicycle-only left turn lane (signed left turn)
- general purpose lane (unsigned turn)
How this should be tagged?
Following is my idea but...
highway, name, lit=yes, surface=asphalt etc
oneway=yes
oneway:biycle=no
lanes=1 (as bicycle lanes are not counted)
vehicle:lanes:forward=no|yes
bicycle:lanes:forward=designated|yes
turn:bicycle:lanes:forward=left|
turn:lanes:forward=|
vehicle:lanes:backward=no
bicycle:lanes:backward=designated
cycleway:left=lane
cycleway:right=???? - there is left turn lane only, so
cycleway:right=lane would be
not entirely correct but there is a left turn lane, cycleway:right would
be worse....
I've always understood the cycleway:left/right=lane to refer to the
presence of a bike lane on one side of the physical roadway or the
other, regardless of the direction that lane travels. After all, the
keys aren't cycleway:forward/backward. For example, in a country that
drives on the right, a contraflow bike lane on the right side of the
roadway would be tagged cycleway:right=opposite_lane, not
cycleway:left=lane.
A *:lanes key might be one way to clarify the layout of that part of the
road: cycleway:left=lane cycleway:left:lanes=2. But note that the turn
lane tagging you suggested above is distinct from the considerations
around cycleway:*; your suggested tagging for turn lanes seems
reasonable to me.
[1] https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/cycleway%3Aright%3Alanes
--
m...@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
