Yes, most likely this won't be required. However I have kept it there in case it works differently in other countries. Maybe not all zebra crossings in Singapore have belisha beacons (for example, I don't know if this is true). That is why I am leaving it open for discussion for now, if after the RFC it is decided that this is a bad idea I'll remove it.
Thanks, IpswichMapper -- 13 Dec 2020, 19:50 by tagging@openstreetmap.org: > It seems to be proposing also belisha_beacon=yes that > is now unused > https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org//search?q=belisha_beacon%3Dyes > > At the same time it has > "However, in countries like the UK, where belisha beacons are used, every > single zebra crossing has belisha beacons installed, so there is no need to > tag them" > > There is also > "Indicates the presence of a "belisha beacon" at the crossing. (Most likely > unnecessary, discuss below)" > > Given there is no indication that it would be useful or needed I think > that it should be not proposed. > > If that it would be useful or needed it can be proposed separately. > > Note that having two proposals in one will result in people voting against > if there are against any of them, so splitting would be a good idea > anyway. > > Dec 13, 2020, 20:25 by tagging@openstreetmap.org: > >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/crossing%3Dpriority >> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/crossing%3Dpriority#Tagging> >> >> Here is my first proposal for a tag to describe pedestrian crossings where >> the pedestrian has right of way over all vehicles on the road from the >> moment they have indicated their intent to cross. I created this because >> "crossing=zebra" or "crossing=marked" aren't clear enough. Please read the >> proposal for more details. >> >> Thanks, >> IpswichMapper >> > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
