Just to clarify: > crossing=priority Indicates that the node is a pedestrian crossing .... when applied to highway=cycleway, should this read bicycle crossing?
when applied to a highway=cycleway, does the tag imply priority for cyclists, pedestrians, or both? > belisha_beacon=yes|no Is belisha beacon a generally known term outside the UK? Since only presence is significant, the value no is useless > segregated=boolean (yes/no) (no default assumed) Since the proposal talks about pedestrians, cycleways and horses crossing: what exactly is segregated when segregated=yes is applied to a cycleway? And with segregated=no, do motorists get a warning that horses may cross on the cycleway? Peter Elderson Op zo 13 dec. 2020 om 21:08 schreef ipswichmapper--- via Tagging < tagging@openstreetmap.org>: > Yes, most likely this won't be required. However I have kept it there in > case it works differently in other countries. Maybe not all zebra crossings > in Singapore have belisha beacons (for example, I don't know if this is > true). That is why I am leaving it open for discussion for now, if after > the RFC it is decided that this is a bad idea I'll remove it. > > Thanks, > IpswichMapper > > -- > > > 13 Dec 2020, 19:50 by tagging@openstreetmap.org: > > It seems to be proposing also belisha_beacon=yes that > is now unused > https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org//search?q=belisha_beacon%3Dyes > > At the same time it has > "However, in countries like the UK, where belisha beacons are used, every > single zebra crossing has belisha beacons installed, so there is no need > to tag them" > > There is also > "Indicates the presence of a "belisha beacon" at the crossing. (Most > likely unnecessary, discuss below)" > > Given there is no indication that it would be useful or needed I think > that it should be not proposed. > > If that it would be useful or needed it can be proposed separately. > > Note that having two proposals in one will result in people voting against > if there are against any of them, so splitting would be a good idea > anyway. > > Dec 13, 2020, 20:25 by tagging@openstreetmap.org: > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/crossing%3Dpriority > <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/crossing%3Dpriority#Tagging> > > Here is my first proposal for a tag to describe pedestrian crossings where > the pedestrian has right of way over all vehicles on the road from the > moment they have indicated their intent to cross. I created this because > "crossing=zebra" or "crossing=marked" aren't clear enough. Please read the > proposal for more details. > > Thanks, > IpswichMapper > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
