> I think you need to expand a little on how to "conflate" a pool with a > river. The > disadvantage of doing so is that the pool then cannot have a name assigned. >
Sorry, my words were not clear enough here. By "conflate" I mean that the pool would simply be part of the river polygon. See this example near Boston: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/91082432#map=16/42.2615/-71.2764 Note that I explicitly included the phrase "if they are named or significant in size" to cover the case where a stream pool has a name. My intent is to craft the definition in such a way that it allows either scheme without preference (i.e. part of the river polygon, or a separate pond/lake polygon with a name).
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
