Though note that for areas without very good DEM this tags may still provide useful info on short section of way.
There is a difference between gradual drop with a normal slope and case where you have bunch of 10 cm high cliffs/kerbs - especially when going uphill. Or 2m long section which is strongly uphill within slope which is normal otherwise. Sep 26, 2022, 14:40 by bradha...@fastmail.com: > > Any good cycling router needs to use a digital elevation model in it's > algorithm, or use elevation tied to the paths somehow (such as with a > gpx track). These odd OSM tags are a sideshow. > > > > > On 9/26/22 03:16, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote: > >> >> >> >> 26 wrz 2022, 09:02 od >> o...@tobias-knerr.de>> : >> >>> On 26.09.22 02:21 Mateusz Konieczny wrote: >>> >>>> But what can be done in cases where there is no real incline but >>>> path goes through series of up and down hops? >>>> >>> >>> I would intuitively prefer if you put the information about the >>> presence of "hops" into a specialized tag instead of making the >>> value space of an established and approved key more messy. >>> >>> Leave incline=* to describe the overall incline of the way in that >>> case. That is: Do you end up lower or higher than you were in the >>> start? >>> >> In this case I am thinking about something >> that overall has tiny elevation change. >> >> What would you propose as such extra tag? >> >> up_and_down=yes >> >> (not really happy about it, but right now I >> have no better idea)? >> >> _______________________________________________Tagging mailing list>> >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
