No, as long as meaning is not being changed. Oct 11, 2022, 15:29 by martianfreeloa...@posteo.net:
> Thanks. Do you see a problem with approving a de facto key? > > > > On 11/10/2022 15:25, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote: > >> I see no value in approving de facto key. >> >> Maybe there would be value in deapproving historic=battlefield >> >> Also, is "are of historic interest" mismatches how >> historic=wayside_shrine >> historic=memorial >> many historic=wayside_cross >> are used. >> >> Oct 11, 2022, 15:15 by martianfreeloa...@posteo.net: >> >> Hello. >> >> I’m proposing to approve the historic=* key together with a number >> of tags: >> >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Historic >> >> historic=* is in widespread use and currently documented as de facto. >> >> Please comment wherever you feel most comfortable: >> - Here >> - On the wiki talk page >> - In the forum >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
