On 4/11/22 00:20, Volker Schmidt wrote:
I think the best way out is to think detached from the meaning of the
strings of characters we use for tagging.
Let's document that we have have certain values for the key "historic"
that describe objects that are not historic, and not even old.
After all the purpose of the wiki is to describe the tagging as is,
not as it should be an ideal tagging system.
Disagree.
Pedantic hat on: This way we end up with colour=black for the colour
white. And colour=clam for some aesthetic judgement of the colour.
We voting on the key/tag, as proposed not the past use (misuse) of the key.
If people want to tag 'old' things with the key 'old' .. I would rather
they use the tag start_date=* as that would have more information.
A 30 year old may think something 50 years 'old' is 'old', an 80 year
'old' probably would not think that is 'old'. Some will conclude that
"old' is too subjective to tag within OSM ...
Future example: cloths lines.
There are 4 possible key values - two of them exist in OSM ... one of
them I 'like' because I have been using it since childhood. That does
not mean that any of the 4 values is 'wrong' .. the question should be
what makes the most sense for most people, failing that what is easiest
to meaningfully translate into other languages (note the trailing s!).
Still thinking about that.
Using a tag for things other than the common meaning of that word (or
word group) is simply confusing and should be avoided.
On Thu, 3 Nov 2022, 14:05 Brian M. Sperlongano, <zelonew...@gmail.com>
wrote:
The main issue I have with this proposal is that there is a
longstanding controversy regarding the historic key. Namely, the
question of whether it is used for things that are historic or
merely old. I don't see how a proposal centered around this key
can move forward with that fundamental debate unaddressed.
On Thu, Nov 3, 2022, 8:56 AM Anne-Karoline Distel
<annekadis...@web.de> wrote:
Thanks for pointing that out, I've closed the vote again, and
will open
again tomorrow. I don't know if that it the procedure when you
correct
an oversight on the proposal page.
Anne
On 03/11/2022 12:16, Daniel Capilla wrote:
> Please,
>
> Check the wiki talk page of this proposal before opening the
voting
> time. Some issues are not cleared resolved.
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Daniel Capilla
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
