Le 17.09.23 à 12:50, Anne-Karoline Distel a écrit :
I'm proposing to establish the lifecycle prefix "vandalised:"
which has been in use for at least 8 years in some form
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Vandalised:
I wonder if it makes sense to be so precise about "past" life cycles:
you arrive at a place, the bench is no longer there
Has it been dismantled? destroyed? vandalised ? unintentionally damaged?
If you're not there at the precise moment of the change of state,
the only thing you can see is that the bench is no longer there
or isn't in a working state anymore
2 "past" lifecycles seems sufficient to me (was: for when there's
nothing left, damaged or equivalent for when there's something
non-functional)
PS : and what's the meaning of vandalised:last_check ?
someone vandalised your last_check ?
it seems more logical to me to put survey:date
if you want to store this meta data
Regards,
Marrc
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
