No, it does not violate this rule. For start it can be treated as property of road.
Jun 3, 2025, 01:02 by [email protected]: > On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 7:07 AM Greg Troxel <> [email protected]> > wrote: > >> António Madeira via Tagging <>> [email protected]>> > writes: >> >> > What I meant is that even if that "ref=49" is wrongly associated to >> >> It does seem like someone is adding incorrect refs based on a >> misunderstanding, and it would be good to have that resolved. People >> with strong opinions doing wrong things and the db ending up that way is >> an unfortunate part of OSM, but comes with the good parts of evolving >> tagging. >> > > It probably wouldn't be a bad idea to start formally deprecating ref=* on > ways. Ref to describe routes on ways violates the "one object, one OSM > entity guideline," and is one of the reasons relations were created as a > primitive in OSM in the first place. If the ref=* on ways dinosaur was > allowed to die the death it should have 15 years ago. > > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
