On 5/17/07, Karl von Randow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
> On 5/16/07, Karl von Randow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Great. Yeah, that sounds reasonable. So once the chaff is cut from the
>> taglibs project, what "is" unstandard?
>
> It's the things that would be in JSTL if it was an open source project
> and not tied to a spec.
>
> Probably not the best name. It was a cheeky/quirky thing I kicked off
> when JSTL came out based on things that new JSTL users were asking
> for.
You're right: it's what you need as a companion to Standard to make JSP
development better... all the things that you'd like to do without
writing scriptlets or beans. So in that sense a name that is tied to
Standard makes very good sense.
The changes I committed to <input> last month bring it up to a very
usable level and are quite extended from the previous version (backwards
compatible, though) so it would make sense to release it on the back of
a new "unstandard" platform.
So let's get cracking. What do we need to do? (with the caveat that we
all have no time, but at least we can have a plan).
I think...
a) Agree on the breakdown of taglibs from above (ie: decide on what
we're going to use as input for the taglib, and what maintenance tasks
we need to do to move those to inactive)
b) As a part of that deciding; we'll learn who 'we' is :)
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
