Just my feedback, several people and I, are using the SFTP solution (as, to be honest, i don't like using the web interface) and we are even recommending to do so.
Anyway, great job !! On Oct 29, 2011 8:15 AM, "Brian Warner" <war...@lothar.com> wrote: > On 10/28/11 12:02 PM, Zooko O'Whielacronx wrote: > > > Short term solution: declare that Tahoe-LAFS v1.9 doesn't support > > Python 2.4 anymore. > > I'm ok with that. The oldest Ubuntu LTS (8.04 Hardy, supported until > April 2013) has python-2.5.2, after which the oldest (10.04 Lucid) will > have python-2.6.5 until April 2015. The oldest supported Debian release > (lenny) has 2.5.2, and current (squeeze) has 2.6.6 . Previous OS-X (10.6 > Snow Leopard) has 2.6.1, and 10.7 Lion reportedly has 2.7.1 . I'm > guessing other OSes are following roughly the same schedule. > > In practical terms, does this mean we should just shut down the CentOS5 > buildslave? > > > If anybody is dying to use Tahoe-LAFS v1.9 with Python 2.4, speak up > > now! > > Yeah! Unless there's a sudden clamor of support for py2.4, I'm dropping > it from 1.9. > > There are a handful of things we can improve once we've properly > abandoned py2.4, but of course those will wait until after 1.9. > > > Possible long-term solution: replace the place where Twisted depends > > on PyCrypto with a dependency on something else > > I'd also like to consider moving SFTP to a plugin (which first entails > creating a plugin system). I'd like to hear folks opinions, but I've got > the general feeling that SFTP is used relatively rarely, compared to the > webapi. > > cheers, > -Brian > _______________________________________________ > tahoe-dev mailing list > tahoe-dev@tahoe-lafs.org > http://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev >
_______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list tahoe-dev@tahoe-lafs.org http://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
