On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 4:41 AM, Zooko O'Whielacronx <zo...@zooko.com>wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Brian Warner <war...@lothar.com> wrote: > > > > In practical terms, does this mean we should just shut down the CentOS5 > > buildslave? > > Well, let's ask the maintainer of the CentOS5 buildslave what he would > do if he wanted to run Tahoe-LAFS on CentOS5. > > Dear FreeStorm: > > Would you > > a. Upgrade to a newer CentOS release, > > b. Install a newer Python on your CentOS5, > > c. Contribute patches to PyCrypto so that it can build with Python 2.4? > > :-) > > though i'm not freestorm, at this point in time rhel6 (and its clones) are getting pretty stable now. i'm a rhel5/6 user and given the choice if i needed to run tahoe-lafs, i would be inclined to upgrade to the latest stable of rhel6 and friends for maintainability reasons in the long run. if i am desperate i would upgrade python and install the needed packages (or use the sumo package). just my two cents as a rhel5 (and compatible clone) user. mind you we still have lots of rhel5 clones in work, so its hard to gauge. thanks jimmy. -- http://www.sgenomics.org/~jtang/
_______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list tahoe-dev@tahoe-lafs.org http://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
