Dear David, to make sure we are on the same page: I did not propose to store IMAP data in Tahoe but to store Tahoe's data on IMAP. For the latter case, I do not see much difference compared to the cloud back ends that are also part of the ticket system IIRC.
Actually I do not have a software project related to Tahoe, I just wanted to propose this. Anyways, but thanks and good luck to you too! Best, Lukas On 11/01/2014 01:27 PM, David Stainton wrote: > Dear Lukas, > > I dare say this does not belong in the Tahoe-LAFS trac ticket system. > You can write all sorts of applications that use Tahoe-LAFS... good > luck with your software project! > > > David > > On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Lukas Pirl <tahoe-...@lukas-pirl.de> wrote: >> Hi everyone! >> >> I just tried to create a ticket that proposes the enhancement of >> implementing an IMAP back end to enable user to make use of proven, >> existing infrastructures. >> >> Since there not much to explain, the ticked was rated as Spam and >> rejected - so may be someone with higher privileges could create such a >> ticket? >> >> I am not familiar with the Tahoe back end API or the details of the IMAP >> protocol but I'd expect that the two would fit together somehow. >> >> Best, >> >> Lukas >> _______________________________________________ >> tahoe-dev mailing list >> tahoe-dev@tahoe-lafs.org >> https://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev _______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list tahoe-dev@tahoe-lafs.org https://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev