On 01/11/14 12:39, Lukas Pirl wrote: > Dear David, > > to make sure we are on the same page: I did not propose to store IMAP > data in Tahoe but to store Tahoe's data on IMAP.
I don't think that's a particularly good fit. The existing backends assume a storage system that can store data at arbitrary keys; IMAP can't do that, since message UIDs are 32-bit integers. (You could maybe hack this using mailbox names as keys, but that still seems like a bad fit.) -- Daira Hopwood ⚥
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list tahoe-dev@tahoe-lafs.org https://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
