Hi, On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 08:14:55PM +0100, bertagaz wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 08:07:46PM +0000, sajolida wrote: > > bertagaz: > > > 0. We might also want a mechanism for devs to pro-actively state they > > > want to > > > keep their branches being build even if the last commit was older than the > > > last release. IIRC > > > > If I understand correctly, adding a dummy commit would bring back my > > branch in the set of branches that are automatically built. So maybe we > > don't need a dedicated mechanism handle those rare cases. > > That's the idea, having a timestamp file that would be use for this dummy > commit. But it comes for free, sure. :)
I had Alan having a look at the blueprint too, she fixed some issues in the scenario and added one for the future. The blueprint has been updated with some proposalsi for each question. If you want to consider them, or propose another one, please have a look. bert. _______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
