On 15/04/15 14:38, intrigeri wrote: > anonym wrote (15 Apr 2015 09:24:48 GMT) : >> The branch is based on devel (although only the changelog (1.4 dummy >> entry) differs from stable), but it is a bugfix so we'd miss out on it >> in a potential Tails 1.3.3. Is this really intentional? > > Yes. I didn't want to risk regressions without letting this code first > mature for a while in a branch that people actually test (that is, > devel). That's why I didn't propose it for 1.3.2, while it was ready > before that release.
Makes sense. I tested an image built from the branch in KVM, Virtualbox and on two bare metal systems without noticing any regression. I don't have a chromebook to test on, so I'm just going with with success reported on the ticket. :) >> Of course, with #8654 the change is in Git for Tails proper. I suppose I >> should still merge into the builder-wheezy APT suite, right? > > I think so, yes. Done. For the record, I had installed the syslinux-utils package from the APT suite into my builder when building the image I tested. Cheers! _______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.