sajolida: > intrigeri: >> sajolida wrote (22 Jun 2015 16:16:07 GMT) : >>> Ok, so what's the next step here? >> >>> - Shall someone sum up all this is in /contribute/release_schedule? >> >> Yes. I've gone through this thread and a quick copy'n'paste summary is: >> >> * always increment the first number with major Debian version >> * also increment the first number whenever it make sense for Tails >> only (user-visible changes) >> * second number: even for bugfix releases, odd for major ones > * we allow ourselves to skip numbers if we release two major or two > minor releases in a row (eg. 1.7 followed by 1.9). >> * add an extra 3rd number for emergency releases
I might have found a bug in our new version numbering scheme... We're saying, regarding the second number, "odd = major" and "even = minor". But at the same time "2.0 = major" (or actually super major). But zero is even [1]. Maybe we should consider using "even = minor" and "odd = major" instead. [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parity_of_zero _______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
