Hi, sajolida wrote (13 Aug 2015 19:36:24 GMT) : > intrigeri: >> sajolida wrote (10 Aug 2015 16:48:49 GMT) : >> Please, no: odd for less stable releases is a widely used convention >> in free software, and using a different one is bound to confuse quite >> a few existing and potential contributors (starting with me).
> It seems like we are mixing up two different concepts here, one being > "major/minor" and another one being "stable/unstable". I don't think the > "stable/unstable" concept applies to Tails as all releases have the same > lifetime and are ready for production. We don't have the opposite > concept of "development release". This is slightly disputable: our major releases are more prone to introducing regressions than what we used to call point-releases. But I realize that this argument of mine is borderline :) > Since we don't have this concept of stability in Tails it sounds more > logical to me to translate "stable=important" into "major=important". > Important releases being granted even number (such as 1.0). I can live with that. > And makes it more logical to call Tails Jessie > 2.0 without workarounds you described. > But I won't fight over it more than that :) Me neither. Please do whatever's needed for the change you proposed in our various repos + Redmine etc., after leaving some time to others to comment further. Perhaps we should make the final decision at the September meeting. Cheers, -- intrigeri _______________________________________________ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
