On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:19:22 +1000 Roy Wallace <waldo000...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 2:15 PM, John Smith > <deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Unless waste_basket=yes is an "approved" tag the likelihood of it > > being searched by anyone not using the tag is almost nil So the bonus is that it works now and (arguably) isn't wrong. > > Hence the question about whether to put it on the wiki. Yeah, I don't know the best approach. I've seen all kinds of approaches and they all end up in argument ~:| > > I guess this is one specific case of the broader problem of what to do > when two separate entities are co-located (i.e. nodes would be right > on top of each other). Well, it depends what you're calling the "bus stop". If you go with the "stop area" approach, these problems go away. > In this case I guess you could use > highway=bus_stop *and* amenity=waste_basket (i.e. share a single > node), but this becomes a problem when you want to tag two things with > the same key, e.g. amenity=bench *and* amenity=shelter. That old chestnut. That is schema fail, but the cabal won't see reason. It's always popping up stopping us from representing the real world. Got the t-shirt. Cheers _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
