On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 9:29 AM, John Henderson <snow...@gmx.com> wrote: > I've made a start on the daunting task of documenting the Hume and > Hovell Walking Track.
Call that daunting, wait till someone does the Bicentennial Trail... > I feel it might be silly of me to clutter the map of Comur Street / Yass > Valley Way in downtown Yass with some kind of highly visible indication > that it's part of the HHWT. I think it's the right thing to do. If it renders messily, maybe ask one of the renderer people their advice. In some cases it would be nice to have a hint to the renderer suggesting not to render it in a car map for example. But a smart renderer might figure it out anyway. The point is, if you were printing out a hiking map, you *would* want it rendered in that place...so we want the information there. > As things stand, if many of the 4WD forestry tracks get reclassified > from hiking to vehicular, it will become impossible to follow the route > without being able to display the route relation itself. Not sure what you mean by "get reclassified'. Steve _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
