On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 10:10 PM, John Smith <deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> So... sports_centre for the actual sporting facilities, something_club >> for the commercial bit? Maybe social_club? "club_rooms", while it >> sounded good for the buildings members genuinely use for their >> meetings and stuff, doesn't sound right for a building the public >> comes to for a feed. > > As covered before, you should be a member to use the club and it's > facilities (the restaurant etc), which is why they are member(ship) > club(s), so amenity=member_club.
Thought I might chip in.... to me this seems to be a matter of trying to cram a complex and ambiguous meaning into a single tag. I couldn't help but be reminded of the footway/cycleway situation. Is it not possible to *tag* what we are trying to indicate (using more than one tag if necessary), rather than to create a *definition in the wiki* that says what we're trying to indicate (and using a single tag)? For example, take a close look at the proposed definition of "member_club" - is it in the form of "if A and B and C, it's a member_club"? If so, isn't it a better solution to *tag* A and B and C? There's no need to create complex definitions. So why do it? _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
