On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Steve Bennett <stevag...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I would have thought so, because afaik these rules are to reduce > traffic noise. Bicycles not being noisy, I would have thought they > weren't included.
Maybe, but it's unclear... Anyone good at chasing down legal definitions of road signs? > ... I'd say "access=destination" is just less specific No, access=* applies to "ALL transport modes" (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access). If this isn't the case in reality, it shouldn't be used, or it should be used in conjunction with foot=*, bicycle=* as appropriate. > It does get messy...partially because the > real world is messy. Say there was a business park with a boom gate > preventing access to unauthorised cars. You might still walk through > it. Or you might not. There's two issues: 1) understanding an ambiguous situation on the ground. In this case, we need to find out who the signs apply to. 2) tagging the situation according to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access. In this case, I suspect access=destination is wrong, because I suspect the signs don't apply to pedestrians (and maybe bicycles). _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
