Hi, Sound good to me to leave the GLR number and Ecolink if you put it with a standard osm key.
Markus. -----Original Message----- From: talk-au-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-au-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of James Livingston Sent: Monday, 28 June 2010 10:31 PM To: OSM Australian Talk List Subject: Re: [talk-au] Queensland parks, forests and conservation areas On 28/06/2010, at 8:16 PM, Markus wrote: > Forests > Landuse=forest > > National Parks > boundary=national_park > leisure=nature_reserve Sounds good. > Protected Areas > > boundary=protected_area > protect_id= Ah, the original data had IUCN codes, so I can put these back in as protect_id 1-6. > I would also remove the non standard key names like derm.qld.gov.au:GLR_NUMBER and FEAT_NAME FEAT_NAME definitely won't go into OSM - however it's useful for me because it contains the road name for some of the ROAD polygons :) Should I leave the Ecolink and/or GLR Number tags in as a reference which identifies the area, so we can match with any future updates? _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.830 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2967 - Release Date: 06/28/10 04:05:00
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
