On 12/01/2011, at 2:48 AM, John Smith wrote: > Martin, for your information there was a bit of work done on this sort > of thing in the past for Aussie parks covered by this, based on data > from http://data.australia.gov.au I think.
I uploaded the dataset I think you're referring to, after discussing tagging on talk-au. > From: M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> > 3. > The most universal feature is IMHO this: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dprotected_area > > allowing for cultural, natural and other protection types. A problem > might arise if a feature is at the same time protected for different > reasons. That sort of what I used, though it's changed a bit since then. There's also problem of marking it boundary=protected_area and boundary=national_park at the same time. Some examples: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/46152942 (Fraser Island) http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/361693 (Gondwana Rainforests) At the time I don't think I knew about protect_id, but I used that later on National Parks. -- James _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
