Who or whatever cc_cleaner is, it seems like it might have issues. It has deleted at least one way that should have been safe. Unless i'm misreading the history somehow.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/41754970/history That was was created by Chadzopkyo who has accepted the odbl according to odbl.de It hadn't been edited since until it was deleted. On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Richard Weait <rich...@weait.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 3:46 PM, John Henderson <snow...@gmx.com> wrote: > > On 02/12/11 01:11, Grant Slater wrote: > > > >> I often watch OSM edits using > >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/LiveMapViewer and noticed the > >> deletes of mostly DrLizAU's contributions. I suspected DrLizAU was > >> removing her own contributions, but cannot back this up. > > > > DrLizAU's ethical standards are very much higher than that in my > experience. > > > > To me it appears that the completely comment-less, stealthy, anonymous > > deletions are more likely to be "official" OSM work. > > Time out. Grant didn't suggest that what cc_cleaner is doing is > unethical. Do you think that it is, John? > > Nor is cc-cleaner anonymous or stealthy. cc_cleaner is just a regular > changeset like any other. While many encourage the use of descriptive > changeset comments some mappers choose not to use them. Have you > asked that user what they are doing? > > Are you disparaging official OSM work? "Official OSM" edits are very > rare indeed. The only ones that I'm aware of would be edits by the > data working group to revert vandalism; those are just regular edits > by regular accounts, marked with descriptive comments and usernames. > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
