The guys at the Department of the Environment and Energy have been very
helpful and responded positively. I've updated the Contributors page to
reflect this:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Department_of_the_Environment_and_Energy
I've also replied asking if it would be possible at this stage to get
permission to use the 2016 version under the same terms.
On 2017-02-11 17:46, Andrew Harvey wrote:
I agree that in the original email thread at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribution/Department_of_the_Environment_and_Energy_CAPAD#Follow-up_Email
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribution/Department_of_the_Environment_and_Energy_CAPAD#Follow-up_Email>
they
didn't grant the permission that the method of attribution we propose is
acceptable, which based on my understanding is required on top of the CC
BY license for the data to be used in OSM.
So thank you Andrew Davidson for following up about this:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribution/Department_of_the_Environment_and_Energy_CAPAD#Follow-up_Email
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribution/Department_of_the_Environment_and_Energy_CAPAD#Follow-up_Email>
As a side note the LWG (License Working Group) are working towards
clarifying the compatibility of CC BY 4.0 as noted at
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2016-December/008558.html
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
