Just wanted to add, that we should get the rights holder to complete the OSMF CC BY waiver https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/ (regardless of if it's CC BY 3 or CC BY 4) before using this data.
Also noting from the blog "Please do not forget that imports need to follow our Import Guidelines", http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines On Tue, 29 Aug 2017, at 11:51 AM, nwastra wrote: > > Thanks Andrew > I remember reading about the rights holder not having time to review > their CC-BY xx wording for a while yet, so CC-BY 3.0 is ok. > This is a large import so I we expect it to take some time to get right > and it is preferable to wait for that instead of mappers adding the data > in a piecemeal fashion prior. > Keep up the good work. > > > On 29 Aug 2017, at 10:48 AM, Andrew Davidson <thesw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > The data came out over a month ago but I hadn't bothered to do any > > processing on it because I had been led to believe that the data was going > > to be released under CC-BY 4.0 and the OSM view seems to be that we need to > > get the rights holder to sign a wavier > > (https://www.mail-archive.com/talk-au@openstreetmap.org/msg10796.html) even > > if they had already said yes. > > > > However, I've just checked and the dataset is actually CC-BY 3.0 so we may > > still be OK to go. > > > > It'll take a while for me to recreate the processing I did on CAPAD2014 and > > I'm not sure when I'll have time to do it. > > > > On 29/8/17 10:16, nwastra wrote: > >> Further to my previous query… > >> I have viewed the thread leading to these… > >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2017-February/011272.html > >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2017-March/011302.html > >> and assume that the permission part is ok and the import is still on track. > >> Is there an update on the timeframe of the import? > >>> Hi > >>> I had been expecting that valid explicit permission to use Collaborative > >>> Australian Protected Areas Database (CAPAD) 2016 to edit and add > >>> information to the OpenStreetMap would have been obtained by now but I > >>> assume that the legal licence compatibility issues need to be resolved. > >>> Is there an estimated timeframe to resolution? > >>> > >>> regards > >>> Nev Wedding > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Talk-au mailing list > >> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
