I recently approached the CAPAD owners and they completed the OSMF CC BY waiver https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:CAPAD_CCBY_waiver.pdf so we're in a better position re licensing now.
They requested some minor changes to the attribution statement to include the contributing agencies which I've already changed at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Department_of_the_Environment_and_Energy Is anyone currently working on comparing the CAPAD 2016 data with what's in OSM? On 30 August 2017 at 09:55, Andrew Harvey <and...@alantgeo.com.au> wrote: > Just wanted to add, that we should get the rights holder to complete the > OSMF CC BY waiver > https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/ (regardless > of if it's CC BY 3 or CC BY 4) before using this data. > > Also noting from the blog "Please do not forget that imports need to > follow our Import Guidelines", > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines > > On Tue, 29 Aug 2017, at 11:51 AM, nwastra wrote: > > > > Thanks Andrew > > I remember reading about the rights holder not having time to review > > their CC-BY xx wording for a while yet, so CC-BY 3.0 is ok. > > This is a large import so I we expect it to take some time to get right > > and it is preferable to wait for that instead of mappers adding the data > > in a piecemeal fashion prior. > > Keep up the good work. > > > > > On 29 Aug 2017, at 10:48 AM, Andrew Davidson <thesw...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > The data came out over a month ago but I hadn't bothered to do any > processing on it because I had been led to believe that the data was going > to be released under CC-BY 4.0 and the OSM view seems to be that we need to > get the rights holder to sign a wavier (https://www.mail-archive.com/ > talk-au@openstreetmap.org/msg10796.html) even if they had already said > yes. > > > > > > However, I've just checked and the dataset is actually CC-BY 3.0 so we > may still be OK to go. > > > > > > It'll take a while for me to recreate the processing I did on > CAPAD2014 and I'm not sure when I'll have time to do it. > > > > > > On 29/8/17 10:16, nwastra wrote: > > >> Further to my previous query… > > >> I have viewed the thread leading to these… > > >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2017- > February/011272.html > > >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2017- > March/011302.html > > >> and assume that the permission part is ok and the import is still on > track. > > >> Is there an update on the timeframe of the import? > > >>> Hi > > >>> I had been expecting that valid explicit permission to use > Collaborative Australian Protected Areas Database (CAPAD) 2016 to edit and > add information to the OpenStreetMap would have been obtained by now but I > assume that the legal licence compatibility issues need to be resolved. > > >>> Is there an estimated timeframe to resolution? > > >>> > > >>> regards > > >>> Nev Wedding > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> Talk-au mailing list > > >> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > > >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Talk-au mailing list > > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
