I've already communicated separately but reiterated here for the list: As CAPAD is permitted source of data, we should reproduce this data, including names, as it appears in the source. Of course, if we have multiple permitted sources with differing data, then we may need to ascertain which is more authoritative. If both are equally authoritative, then the more recent is probably preferred. However I understand the source of the new names data is not a source for which OSM has permission. Therefore we may have to continue to use currently permitted data from CAPAD until new CAPAD data is available next year.
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018, at 5:27 PM, Lee Mason wrote: > > Seeking comment, suggestions, objections to continuing importing > Australian marine parks. Boundaries from CAPAD 2016, except names are > amended as “Marine Park” not “Commonwealth Marine Reserve”.> > Technically speaking, the vast majority of Commonwealth Marine > Reserves were never in effect (no changes on water) until a just few > days ago when the marine parks came into effect.> > Regards, > Lee > > _________________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
