>- What is the protect_class?
I’m pretty sure that protect_class is just the IUCN classification<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IUCN_protected_area_categories> of the protected area, which can roughly be interpreted as the conservation significance of the area. At least that is my interpretation from the wiki. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dprotected_area The table in the above link is a bit confused in regards to Australia, it correctly states in the category 1 column: “In Australia there is no general relationship between the title given to a protected area and its IUCN category. Tagging should be based on data from (CAPAD)” But in categories 2-6, it contradicts and lists specific protection titles for a protect class. Speaking from a Tasmanian example, Conservation Areas span from IUCN 1a to VI. But the vast majority are IV, V or VI. > is boundary=protected_area enough for the relations, or should it have type=boundary or type=multipolygon? I think type=boundary and boundary=protected_area for the relations. Type=multipolygon is more for physical objects such as water, wood, etc. Hope that helps. Lee ________________________________ From: Andrew Harvey <andrew.harv...@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, December 3, 2018 6:50:49 PM To: OSM Australian Talk List Cc: Lee Mason; o...@97k.com Subject: SA Aquatic Reserves Import I'm proposing to import 5 aquatic reserves in SA as sourced from https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdata.sa.gov.au%2Fdata%2Fdataset%2Faquatic-reserves&data=02%7C01%7C%7C94bca20cea9b4262dfc408d658f415a0%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636794202683220412&sdata=Yn4%2FnjNgpkFAw%2FbpeINY9ks%2FQR2liDg5%2BLql%2B9zzTbs%3D&reserved=0 1. Licensing okay per https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.openstreetmap.org%2Fwiki%2FAustralian_Data_Catalogue&data=02%7C01%7C%7C94bca20cea9b4262dfc408d658f415a0%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636794202683220412&sdata=wVhUJyyyZA0%2BmVlY95gSpfW%2BYUzRyBTgk%2BfOsQsgP1s%3D&reserved=0 will add a list to Contributors wiki page as part of the import 2. Conflation with existing - confirmed manually none of these exist in OSM currently - the metadata for this data says that the coastal borders are mean high water mark, so these should be glued with the OSM coastline, however I'm proposing that be done post-import as a clean up task 3. Tagging - name is the only tag brought across - wikidata/wikpedia tags added manually - protection_title=Aquatic Reserve - operator_type=government - operator=PIRSA Fisheries & Aquaculture - boundary=protected_area - note=coastline boundaries are Mean High Water Mark from DEWNR, they can be glued to the OSM mean high water mark coastline 4. Open questions - What is the protect_class? - is boundary=protected_area enough for the relations, or should it have type=boundary or type=multipolygon? 5. Import Process Open https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftianjara.net%2Fdata%2Fosm%2Fimports%2Fsa-aquatic-reserves.osm&data=02%7C01%7C%7C94bca20cea9b4262dfc408d658f415a0%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636794202683220412&sdata=O%2Fv9%2BWGLMESstEtZ2AtW8X0Myg5eIgMPb5wxqcBYHMk%3D&reserved=0 in JOSM and upload - done using dedicated import account - changeset source tag pointing to https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdata.sa.gov.au%2Fdata%2Fdataset%2Faquatic-reserves&data=02%7C01%7C%7C94bca20cea9b4262dfc408d658f415a0%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636794202683220412&sdata=Yn4%2FnjNgpkFAw%2FbpeINY9ks%2FQR2liDg5%2BLql%2B9zzTbs%3D&reserved=0 - changeset tag pointing to this thread /cc Lee and cleary since you worked on the commonwealth level marine parks, any feedback on what I've proposed here would be great
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
