Thanks. Because you cannot edit the Overpass query for an existing challenge, I created a new one that has the LPI imagery as default backdrop. The challenge lives here: https://maproulette.org/mr3/browse/challenges/3387 <https://maproulette.org/mr3/browse/challenges/3387> It has 9800+ tasks. I deleted the old one. Thanks for the suggestions! Martijn
> On Dec 11, 2018, at 5:31 AM, Andrew Harvey <and...@alantgeo.com.au> wrote: > > I just checked again, it looks like you haven't corrected this yet, so a > friendly reminder it would be nice to have this fixed. > > I think it's also a good idea to include the NSW LPI Imagery as the default > background layer for this task. I just filed > https://github.com/osmlab/maproulette3/issues/572 > <https://github.com/osmlab/maproulette3/issues/572> in relation to this. > > On Sun, 9 Dec 2018, at 4:53 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote: >> Andrew H-- correct and I wasn't suggesting that you amend it yourself :) I >> will make the update when I find a moment. >> Andrew H/D -- thanks for pointing me to the import plan. >> -- >> Martijn van Exel >> m...@rtijn.org >> >> >> >> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018, at 17:29, Andrew Harvey wrote: >>> On Sat., 8 Dec. 2018, 10:38 am Martijn van Exel <m...@rtijn.org >>> <mailto:m...@rtijn.org> wrote: >>> That is a good point. The query would probably be easy enough to modify. >>> Something like this... >>> >>> [timeout:190]; >>> area[name=“New South Wales"]->.a; >>> way[highway~"motorway|trunk|primary"][!lanes][!"lanes:forward"][!"lanes:backward"](area.a); >>> out body geom qt; >>> >>> Yeah but I don't think I can modify your maproulette challenge, are you >>> able to? >>> >>> I think it needs to be pre-processed a bit more to weed out the very short >>> segments. And perhaps work on areas where lanes actually matter (urban) >>> first. >>> >>> I was looking at how to slice that and got interested in the status of >>> administrative boundary relations for Australia. It seems to be >>> inconsistent, for example in South Australia there is pretty good (but not >>> complete) coverage of admin_level=6 http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/EmZ >>> <http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/EmZ> and even one admin_level=8 >>> (http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/En0 <http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/En0>) but in >>> other states the admin_level=6 coverage is pretty sparse or absent >>> (https://imgur.com/a/gmUJs2r <https://imgur.com/a/gmUJs2r>, query at >>> http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/En1 <http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/En1> but watch >>> out, it’s a lot of data). If you all think this is useful to fix / complete >>> perhaps we can set up a page to coordinate. I’m happy to help. >>> >>> There's another thread ongoing on this list about importing suburb, >>> localities and LGA boundaries. >>> >>> -- >>> Martijn van Exel >>> m...@rtijn.org <mailto:m...@rtijn.org> >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 6, 2018, at 17:23, Andrew Harvey wrote: >>>> Overall I think it's a great idea. >>>> >>>> Could you filter out ways that have lanes:forward and lanes:backward? >>>> eg. https://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3375/task/6686753 >>>> <https://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3375/task/6686753> which >>>> shouldn't need a redundant lanes tag as you can just add them up. >>>> On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 at 10:49, Martijn van Exel <m...@rtijn.org >>>> <mailto:m...@rtijn.org>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi folks. >>>>> I created MapRoulette challenge asking mappers to look at aerial images >>>>> and add lane tags to major roads. >>>>> https://maproulette.org/mr3/browse/challenges/3375 >>>>> <https://maproulette.org/mr3/browse/challenges/3375> >>>>> This particular one is for NSW but can easily be ‘cloned’ for other >>>>> regions. >>>>> I wanted to get your opinion on this — good / bad idea? Can it be >>>>> improved? Smaller regions? Any feedback welcome. >>>>> Martijn >>>>> >>>>> PS the Overpass Query this is based on is: >>>>> >>>>> [timeout:190]; >>>>> area[name="New South Wales"]->.a; >>>>> way[highway~"motorway|trunk|primary"][!lanes](area.a); >>>>> out body geom qt; >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Talk-au mailing list >>>>> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-au@openstreetmap.org> >>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >>>>> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-au mailing list >> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-au@openstreetmap.org> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au> > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-au@openstreetmap.org> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au > <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au>
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
