I don't know what the OSM convention is for this, but I tend to agree with Nemanja. It makes more sense to split the two halves of the road, rather than have them as a single way.
On 22 January 2019 8:23:35 am AEDT, "Nemanja Bračko" <brack...@gmail.com> wrote: >@Warin, > >I personally do not see why is it wrong if you split? It is just two >segments merged in one node. Geometry and data are exactly the same >just it >is represented as two, instead of one line. > >If we go deeper in this issue, it is actually wrong, because you have >marked/mapped 2 physical segments with just one line. Angle is not >natural >for any road. However, it doesn't make any difference in routing so it >is >acceptable to be mapped as one line in cases like this. > >Thanks, >Nemanja > >On Mon, 21 Jan 2019, 21:33 Ben Kelley, <ben.kel...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Personally I think that's a handy warning. >> >> - Ben >> >> >> >> On Tue., 22 Jan. 2019, 07:25 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com wrote: >> >>> On 22/01/19 02:45, Nemanja Bračko wrote: >>> >>> I agree on that, but that's the way how this tool works. >>> >>> >>> So you will have to accept that the tool is wrong and ignore its >output. >>> >>> Altering the map to comply with a tool that is wrong is wrong. >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-au mailing list >> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >> >-- > >Sent from my phone
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
