Hi Andrew, Thanks for your feedback. I've edited the changeset and uploaded it:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67040007 Regards, David Wales On 9/2/19 5:02 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote: > I'm not sure I follow your example, but... > > The rule of thumb is to only split the way when there is a physical > barrier preventing moving from one lane to the other. > > As for Key:lanes, according to > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes it's only for marked > lanes, but Microsoft has been adding many Key:lanes even when > unmarked, though there's a bit of discussion about this > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:lanes. > > On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 at 08:41, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> So what is considered "best practice" when it comes to lanes - physical or >> theoretical markings? >> >> Situation: you have a two-lane, one-way, primary road with an exit coming up. >> >> Your road is marked as highway=primary, one_way=yes, lanes=2 >> >> Should you map in an actual, physical lane splitting off to the left along >> the curve of the exit ramp, marked as =primary_link, lanes=1; or change the >> =primary to lanes=3, turn:lanes=slight_left|none|none? >> >> I'll openly admit that I add extra physical lanes because I think it "looks" >> better that way & makes more sense to follow a "real" road on the map, >> rather than just be told "turn slightly left". >> >> Thanks >> >> Graeme
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
